Reaper: Season 1, Episode 6 "Leon" (C+)
I was utterly confused this entire episode since I taped "NCIS" and "Reaper" on the same tape and I think my VCR clock was set two minutes fast. A good episode should not have something happen in the beginning without delving into it a bit further sometime during the episode, though maybe that is just my confusion talking. This Leon character is sort of fun but also obviously a bit dangerous. I did not quite get who the escaped soul was here (Leon? the dog?). Bret Harrison does do a great job here, especially towards the end. I am glad that he and Andi may have a fighting chance.
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
What I'm Watching: NCIS (100th episode)
NCIS: Season 5, Episode 6 "Chimera" (B-)
100th episode? Big deal. Nothing special to commend here. It is business as usual for the show even though the events are quite mysterious. I do not have much else to say about this show since I frequently find myself zoning out and not being compelled to care too much about what is taking place onscreen. Will I tune in next week? Probably, but I should really drop it.
100th episode? Big deal. Nothing special to commend here. It is business as usual for the show even though the events are quite mysterious. I do not have much else to say about this show since I frequently find myself zoning out and not being compelled to care too much about what is taking place onscreen. Will I tune in next week? Probably, but I should really drop it.
What I'm Watching: Californication (Season Finale)
Californication: Season 1, Episode 12 "The Last Waltz" (B+)
I could not have asked for a more perfect ending to this season. Hank is the good guy who does not try to mess anything up with the wedding but still ends up getting the girl. I am really excited for next season, but I am not sure how it will work. In any case, stellar performances from everyone this entire season. Good to see Charlie back together with his wife. And Mia is not quite as volatile and unstoppable as she seemed. See you next summer.
Season grade: A-
I could not have asked for a more perfect ending to this season. Hank is the good guy who does not try to mess anything up with the wedding but still ends up getting the girl. I am really excited for next season, but I am not sure how it will work. In any case, stellar performances from everyone this entire season. Good to see Charlie back together with his wife. And Mia is not quite as volatile and unstoppable as she seemed. See you next summer.
Season grade: A-
What I'm Watching: Weeds
Weeds: Season 3, Episode 12 "The Dark Time" (B+)
Business competitors for Nancy are always a bad thing for her but a great thing for the viewers. Hopefully things will turn out a bit better for all involved than last time a la U-Turn and Peter dying. I hope they do a bit more with Sprague Grayden ("Six Feet Under", "Jericho"). Moving the plants to Celia's home is genius. Mary-Louise Parker, Elizabeth Perkins, Matthew Modine, and Kevin Nealon: is there a better team of actors working in dark comedy today?
Business competitors for Nancy are always a bad thing for her but a great thing for the viewers. Hopefully things will turn out a bit better for all involved than last time a la U-Turn and Peter dying. I hope they do a bit more with Sprague Grayden ("Six Feet Under", "Jericho"). Moving the plants to Celia's home is genius. Mary-Louise Parker, Elizabeth Perkins, Matthew Modine, and Kevin Nealon: is there a better team of actors working in dark comedy today?
Golden Globe Musings: Best Actor in a TV Series - Comedy/Musical
The following represents some preliminary thoughts on Golden Globe contenders for the given category. Predictions will be narrowed and revised towards the end of November or the beginning of December. A reminder that last year’s nominees mean zilch at the Globes and that the race is almost entirely unpredictable.
Last year’s nominees:
TONY SHALHOUB, MONK
JASON LEE, MY NAME IS EARL
STEVE CARRELL, THE OFFICE
ZACH BRAFF, SCRUBS
ALEC BALDWIN, 30 ROCK (winner)
This year’s top contenders:
KELSEY GRAMMER, BACK TO YOU
This show is dismally awful, and Grammer overplays his role as much as he can. He is a respected comedian who won numerous awards for “Cheers” and “Frasier”, so that may overcome the poor quality of the show (which has gotten better reviews than I give it credit for). FOX comedies to not have a good track record with the Globes, with three major exceptions, and all three shows were far more critically adored than this one (“Arrested Development”, “Malcolm in the Middle”, and “Ally McBeal”).
DAVID DUCHOVNY, CALIFORNICATION
The man is simply great on the new Showtime comedy, and he was nominated years ago for his lead performance on “The X-Files”. It is all a question of how much the Globes will be willing to embrace another Showtime series. They went wild for “Weeds” and were semi-enthusiastic about “Sleeper Cell”, “Huff”, and “Dexter”, but completely snubbed “The L Word” and “Brotherhood”.
LARRY DAVID, CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM
David was nominated two years ago in this category, the last time his show aired during a Globes eligibility period. His character is so vile that it is a love-him, hate-him affair. His affiliation with “Seinfeld” and this series give him a certain respectability that may get him in if he is not overshadowed by more overtly difficult comedic performances.
TONY SHALHOUB, MONK
The only factor for Shalhoub’s inclusion is whether awards will ever tire of him. The show is pretty much at the same quality it always has been, and awards continue to be deservedly heaped upon him. There is nothing new about his performance, which may allow new entrants to seep in and replace him.
JASON LEE, MY NAME IS EARL
Despite a warm reception its freshman year, “My Name is Earl” received less accolades at both the Emmy Awards and the Globes during its second season. Lee did get a nomination last year, and his nomination really rides on how much they like NBC (last year, four out of the five nominees came from NBC’s Thursday night comedy lineup, one lead from each show). “Earl” does have the stalest buzz of the four, however.
STEVE CARRELL, THE OFFICE
To many, “The Office” is only getting better. Carrell won this award two years ago but lost out to newcomer Alec Baldwin last year. I feel pretty safe saying that Carrell should be able to slide in without much trouble.
JAMES RODAY, PSYCH
“Psych” received no major award nominations for its first year, but Roday really does go crazy with his performance. I think the influx of new shows and those darn NBC series will keep Roday out for the time being.
LEE PACE, PUSHING DAISIES
Pace is the lead of the daring and colorful new dramedy “Pushing Daisies”. I personally do not think he is the strongest element on the show and sort of goes along for the ride instead of carrying the show himself. The Globes do like to honor the stars of shows they like even if the stars are unlikely to amass awards anywhere else (Wentworth Miller for “Prison Break”, for instance).
ZACH BRAFF, SCRUBS
“Scrubs” enters its final season this fall, which is a call to the Emmy Awards to recognize it, but not the Globes. Braff has been the lone Globe nominee for the series in its entire history, but he has been noticed for the past three years straight. He was goofier than ever this year, but “Scrubs” does have the advantage of having aired almost a complete season during early 2007 plus a quarter season from October to the nominations deadline..
ALEC BALDWIN, 30 ROCK
Baldwin is so unbeatably hilarious on this wildly popular series (critically, not so much in the ratings). As far as I know, reviews for the show continue to be overwhelmingly positive, so I see absolutely no reason that Baldwin’s name would be omitted from the list of nominees.
Anyone else? Hot new shows “Reaper” and “Chuck” both have charismatic leads in Bret Harrison and Zachary Levi, respectively, but I doubt either those will enter in to the awards field (“Reaper” also has the disadvantage of airing on the CW, which rarely receives mentions). Tracy Morgan might be considered lead on “30 Rock”, but his performance as compared to Baldwin is nothing. Charlie Sheen was here twice a few years ago, but his time may have passed. And I can only hope that either Jemaine Clement or Bret McKenzie makes it in for their wonderful performances on the quirky “Flight of the Conchords”.
Current predictions:
DAVID DUCHOVNY, CALIFORNICATION
TONY SHALHOUB, MONK
STEVE CARRELL, THE OFFICE
LEE PACE, PUSHING DAISIES
ALEC BALDWIN, 30 ROCK
Last year’s nominees:
TONY SHALHOUB, MONK
JASON LEE, MY NAME IS EARL
STEVE CARRELL, THE OFFICE
ZACH BRAFF, SCRUBS
ALEC BALDWIN, 30 ROCK (winner)
This year’s top contenders:
KELSEY GRAMMER, BACK TO YOU
This show is dismally awful, and Grammer overplays his role as much as he can. He is a respected comedian who won numerous awards for “Cheers” and “Frasier”, so that may overcome the poor quality of the show (which has gotten better reviews than I give it credit for). FOX comedies to not have a good track record with the Globes, with three major exceptions, and all three shows were far more critically adored than this one (“Arrested Development”, “Malcolm in the Middle”, and “Ally McBeal”).
DAVID DUCHOVNY, CALIFORNICATION
The man is simply great on the new Showtime comedy, and he was nominated years ago for his lead performance on “The X-Files”. It is all a question of how much the Globes will be willing to embrace another Showtime series. They went wild for “Weeds” and were semi-enthusiastic about “Sleeper Cell”, “Huff”, and “Dexter”, but completely snubbed “The L Word” and “Brotherhood”.
LARRY DAVID, CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM
David was nominated two years ago in this category, the last time his show aired during a Globes eligibility period. His character is so vile that it is a love-him, hate-him affair. His affiliation with “Seinfeld” and this series give him a certain respectability that may get him in if he is not overshadowed by more overtly difficult comedic performances.
TONY SHALHOUB, MONK
The only factor for Shalhoub’s inclusion is whether awards will ever tire of him. The show is pretty much at the same quality it always has been, and awards continue to be deservedly heaped upon him. There is nothing new about his performance, which may allow new entrants to seep in and replace him.
JASON LEE, MY NAME IS EARL
Despite a warm reception its freshman year, “My Name is Earl” received less accolades at both the Emmy Awards and the Globes during its second season. Lee did get a nomination last year, and his nomination really rides on how much they like NBC (last year, four out of the five nominees came from NBC’s Thursday night comedy lineup, one lead from each show). “Earl” does have the stalest buzz of the four, however.
STEVE CARRELL, THE OFFICE
To many, “The Office” is only getting better. Carrell won this award two years ago but lost out to newcomer Alec Baldwin last year. I feel pretty safe saying that Carrell should be able to slide in without much trouble.
JAMES RODAY, PSYCH
“Psych” received no major award nominations for its first year, but Roday really does go crazy with his performance. I think the influx of new shows and those darn NBC series will keep Roday out for the time being.
LEE PACE, PUSHING DAISIES
Pace is the lead of the daring and colorful new dramedy “Pushing Daisies”. I personally do not think he is the strongest element on the show and sort of goes along for the ride instead of carrying the show himself. The Globes do like to honor the stars of shows they like even if the stars are unlikely to amass awards anywhere else (Wentworth Miller for “Prison Break”, for instance).
ZACH BRAFF, SCRUBS
“Scrubs” enters its final season this fall, which is a call to the Emmy Awards to recognize it, but not the Globes. Braff has been the lone Globe nominee for the series in its entire history, but he has been noticed for the past three years straight. He was goofier than ever this year, but “Scrubs” does have the advantage of having aired almost a complete season during early 2007 plus a quarter season from October to the nominations deadline..
ALEC BALDWIN, 30 ROCK
Baldwin is so unbeatably hilarious on this wildly popular series (critically, not so much in the ratings). As far as I know, reviews for the show continue to be overwhelmingly positive, so I see absolutely no reason that Baldwin’s name would be omitted from the list of nominees.
Anyone else? Hot new shows “Reaper” and “Chuck” both have charismatic leads in Bret Harrison and Zachary Levi, respectively, but I doubt either those will enter in to the awards field (“Reaper” also has the disadvantage of airing on the CW, which rarely receives mentions). Tracy Morgan might be considered lead on “30 Rock”, but his performance as compared to Baldwin is nothing. Charlie Sheen was here twice a few years ago, but his time may have passed. And I can only hope that either Jemaine Clement or Bret McKenzie makes it in for their wonderful performances on the quirky “Flight of the Conchords”.
Current predictions:
DAVID DUCHOVNY, CALIFORNICATION
TONY SHALHOUB, MONK
STEVE CARRELL, THE OFFICE
LEE PACE, PUSHING DAISIES
ALEC BALDWIN, 30 ROCK
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Golden Globe Musings: Best Actress in a TV Series - Drama
Golden Globe Musings: Best Actress in a TV Series – Drama
The following represents some preliminary thoughts on Golden Globe contenders for the given category. Predictions will be narrowed and revised towards the end of November or the beginning of December. A reminder that last year’s nominees mean zilch at the Globes and that the race is almost entirely unpredictable.
Last year’s nominees:
KYRA SEDGWICK, THE CLOSER (winner)
ELLEN POMPEO, GREY’S ANATOMY
EVANGELINE LILLY, LOST
PATRICIA ARQUETTE, MEDIUM
EDIE FALCO, THE SOPRANOS
This year’s top contenders:
SALLY FIELD, BROTHERS & SISTERS (new show #1)
Somehow, Field won the Emmy so I guess the Globes may have to be next. Unless her show is completely ignored by the Globes (she was snubbed last year after her show had been on the air a few months), she should have no trouble making it in.
KYRA SEDGWICK, THE CLOSER
There is almost no way that Sedgwick could miss out here. Her show has not gone downhill with critics or ratings-wise. Her only competition comes from five high-powered women on popular new shows.
GLENN CLOSE, DAMAGES (new show #2)
Close is not that good on the show, but just look at any other frequently awarded actress who took on a TV role. Close also got nominated two years ago in this category for her role on another FX show, “The Shield”. I think “Damages” itself will fall short gaining awards, but Close should have less trouble.
ELLEN POMPEO, GREY’S ANATOMY
I find Pompeo grating to listen to, and so do many others, but this is the Golden Globes we are talking about, where almost anything goes. “Grey’s Anatomy” has been getting bad buzz lately, and I feel like Pompeo was a one-time fling anyway.
MARISKA HARGITAY, LAW & ORDER: SVU
Hargitay has missed out on a nomination the past two years, but she won the year before that. The “Law & Order” franchise follows a general procedural format in regards to awards systems. Hargitay became hot a few years ago after the show had already aired several seasons and may have fizzled out simply due to the fact that it is pretty much the same thing over and over.
PATRICIA ARQUETTE, MEDIUM
Arquette has been nominated the past two years for her truly dismal performance on the crime series. She could easily slip through the cracks with the arrival of those five new shows.
KATE WALSH, PRIVATE PRACTICE (new show #3)
Does anyone actually think this show is a quality program or do they just enjoy watching it? Walsh made the top ten for Best Supporting Actress in a Drama Series for the Emmy Awards this past year for originating the same role on “Grey’s Anatomy”. I cannot stand her, but it seems that many adore her, and if they can take the performance seriously enough, she could well be in.
MINNIE DRIVER, THE RICHES (new show #4)
Driver is a revelation in this show and earned the series’ lone Emmy nomination this past year. As I have mentioned, freshmen FX series have an amazing track record at the Golden Globe, especially for lead performers. I cannot imagine that Driver will find herself left out.
HOLLY HUNTER, SAVING GRACE (new show #5)
Hunter is a huge awards magnet, though not recently, with the exception of across-the-board nominations for her supporting role in the film “Thirteen” in 2003. This could be a major comeback for Hunter, and the show did well enough. If voters do not find her too off-putting, she may get a nomination.
EDIE FALCO, THE SOPRANOS
Falco really did not have a large role in the final season of the mob dramedy. She got an Emmy nomination this year and, unlike co-star Gandolfini, has not been snubbed by the Globes the past few years. I think she will still succumb to Sedgwick and the stars of the five new shows.
Anyone else? “Lost” actress Evangeline Lilly scored a nomination from a weak array of contenders last year, but took a real backseat to the rest of the actors this year. Polly Walker received a nod two years ago when “Rome” last aired, and if anyone stuck around to watch the show’s second and final season, she might get a repeat nomination. I do not believe that anyone will get through enough of “Tell Me You Love Me” to check off Sonya Walger on their ballots. Angie Harmon, lead actress on “Women’s Murder Club”, might have a shot. I would have to hope that no one would think Michelle Ryan deserves a nomination for “Bionic Woman”. And it is not too late to root for Mary McDonnell of “Battlestar Galactica”.
Current predictions:
SALLY FIELD, BROTHERS & SISTERS
KYRA SEDGWICK, THE CLOSER
GLENN CLOSE, DAMAGES
MINNIE DRIVER, THE RICHES
HOLLY HUNTER, SAVING GRACE
The following represents some preliminary thoughts on Golden Globe contenders for the given category. Predictions will be narrowed and revised towards the end of November or the beginning of December. A reminder that last year’s nominees mean zilch at the Globes and that the race is almost entirely unpredictable.
Last year’s nominees:
KYRA SEDGWICK, THE CLOSER (winner)
ELLEN POMPEO, GREY’S ANATOMY
EVANGELINE LILLY, LOST
PATRICIA ARQUETTE, MEDIUM
EDIE FALCO, THE SOPRANOS
This year’s top contenders:
SALLY FIELD, BROTHERS & SISTERS (new show #1)
Somehow, Field won the Emmy so I guess the Globes may have to be next. Unless her show is completely ignored by the Globes (she was snubbed last year after her show had been on the air a few months), she should have no trouble making it in.
KYRA SEDGWICK, THE CLOSER
There is almost no way that Sedgwick could miss out here. Her show has not gone downhill with critics or ratings-wise. Her only competition comes from five high-powered women on popular new shows.
GLENN CLOSE, DAMAGES (new show #2)
Close is not that good on the show, but just look at any other frequently awarded actress who took on a TV role. Close also got nominated two years ago in this category for her role on another FX show, “The Shield”. I think “Damages” itself will fall short gaining awards, but Close should have less trouble.
ELLEN POMPEO, GREY’S ANATOMY
I find Pompeo grating to listen to, and so do many others, but this is the Golden Globes we are talking about, where almost anything goes. “Grey’s Anatomy” has been getting bad buzz lately, and I feel like Pompeo was a one-time fling anyway.
MARISKA HARGITAY, LAW & ORDER: SVU
Hargitay has missed out on a nomination the past two years, but she won the year before that. The “Law & Order” franchise follows a general procedural format in regards to awards systems. Hargitay became hot a few years ago after the show had already aired several seasons and may have fizzled out simply due to the fact that it is pretty much the same thing over and over.
PATRICIA ARQUETTE, MEDIUM
Arquette has been nominated the past two years for her truly dismal performance on the crime series. She could easily slip through the cracks with the arrival of those five new shows.
KATE WALSH, PRIVATE PRACTICE (new show #3)
Does anyone actually think this show is a quality program or do they just enjoy watching it? Walsh made the top ten for Best Supporting Actress in a Drama Series for the Emmy Awards this past year for originating the same role on “Grey’s Anatomy”. I cannot stand her, but it seems that many adore her, and if they can take the performance seriously enough, she could well be in.
MINNIE DRIVER, THE RICHES (new show #4)
Driver is a revelation in this show and earned the series’ lone Emmy nomination this past year. As I have mentioned, freshmen FX series have an amazing track record at the Golden Globe, especially for lead performers. I cannot imagine that Driver will find herself left out.
HOLLY HUNTER, SAVING GRACE (new show #5)
Hunter is a huge awards magnet, though not recently, with the exception of across-the-board nominations for her supporting role in the film “Thirteen” in 2003. This could be a major comeback for Hunter, and the show did well enough. If voters do not find her too off-putting, she may get a nomination.
EDIE FALCO, THE SOPRANOS
Falco really did not have a large role in the final season of the mob dramedy. She got an Emmy nomination this year and, unlike co-star Gandolfini, has not been snubbed by the Globes the past few years. I think she will still succumb to Sedgwick and the stars of the five new shows.
Anyone else? “Lost” actress Evangeline Lilly scored a nomination from a weak array of contenders last year, but took a real backseat to the rest of the actors this year. Polly Walker received a nod two years ago when “Rome” last aired, and if anyone stuck around to watch the show’s second and final season, she might get a repeat nomination. I do not believe that anyone will get through enough of “Tell Me You Love Me” to check off Sonya Walger on their ballots. Angie Harmon, lead actress on “Women’s Murder Club”, might have a shot. I would have to hope that no one would think Michelle Ryan deserves a nomination for “Bionic Woman”. And it is not too late to root for Mary McDonnell of “Battlestar Galactica”.
Current predictions:
SALLY FIELD, BROTHERS & SISTERS
KYRA SEDGWICK, THE CLOSER
GLENN CLOSE, DAMAGES
MINNIE DRIVER, THE RICHES
HOLLY HUNTER, SAVING GRACE
What I'm Watching: Samantha Who?
Samantha Who: Season 1, Episode 3 “The Wedding” (B+)
People think that this gimmick of Samantha continually discovering how mean she was and trying to atone for her sins could get old quickly. I, for one, enjoy it a lot. A far less clever concept mysteriously worked wonders for audiences with “My Name is Earl”, and Christina Applegate is a far more charismatic and likeable lead than Jason Lee’s Earl. Keeping Samantha’s wannabe friend around is proving to be quite a good idea, with her shocking kiss with Samantha’s ex-boyfriend and her final scene with Samantha. Samantha’s parents are great, and her genuine “I didn’t know!” reaction is endearing. Recalling her memories one by one is also a great tool to develop her character.
Breaking news: As of this post, "Samantha Who?" has been given a full-season order.
People think that this gimmick of Samantha continually discovering how mean she was and trying to atone for her sins could get old quickly. I, for one, enjoy it a lot. A far less clever concept mysteriously worked wonders for audiences with “My Name is Earl”, and Christina Applegate is a far more charismatic and likeable lead than Jason Lee’s Earl. Keeping Samantha’s wannabe friend around is proving to be quite a good idea, with her shocking kiss with Samantha’s ex-boyfriend and her final scene with Samantha. Samantha’s parents are great, and her genuine “I didn’t know!” reaction is endearing. Recalling her memories one by one is also a great tool to develop her character.
Breaking news: As of this post, "Samantha Who?" has been given a full-season order.
What I'm Watching: Heroes
Heroes: Season 2, Episode 6 “The Line” (D-)
This show just keeps getting further entangled in its stupid plotlines so that it will be even more difficult to cut off the storylines of characters who really need to be disposed off. Hiro really needs to get out of Japan, and reevaluate his understanding of the space-time continuum so that he can just teleport back to the moment before Ando wastes his time reading Hiro’s long tale of impossible love. The writers need to understand that Claire being a cheerleader was intriguing because of the tagline “Save the cheerleader, save the world”. Fans, as far as I can assume, are not dying to see Claire back in her uniform but rather to see her using her powers for something other than having her boyfriend drop her from the sky and faking out another cheerleader. For a moment we think that Sylar is going to have a deep, sympathetic conversation with Murderer Brother when he begins “you don’t understand me”, but no, he means that Murderer Brother really cannot understand the words coming out of his mouth. I think it would be more interesting to see Sylar actually make some friends and form a fictional “Sylar’s Army” (there is a fan group which calls itself “Sylar’s Army”) instead of plotting to kill everyone he comes across. The show needs to stop being like “Lost” and only featuring a few characters each episode (missing this episode: Parkman & Nathan). Spend more time with HRG and his memory-taking Haitian sidekick and with the immensely powerful Peter while de-emphasizing Suresh and maybe this show can crawl back out of the hole he is in.
This show just keeps getting further entangled in its stupid plotlines so that it will be even more difficult to cut off the storylines of characters who really need to be disposed off. Hiro really needs to get out of Japan, and reevaluate his understanding of the space-time continuum so that he can just teleport back to the moment before Ando wastes his time reading Hiro’s long tale of impossible love. The writers need to understand that Claire being a cheerleader was intriguing because of the tagline “Save the cheerleader, save the world”. Fans, as far as I can assume, are not dying to see Claire back in her uniform but rather to see her using her powers for something other than having her boyfriend drop her from the sky and faking out another cheerleader. For a moment we think that Sylar is going to have a deep, sympathetic conversation with Murderer Brother when he begins “you don’t understand me”, but no, he means that Murderer Brother really cannot understand the words coming out of his mouth. I think it would be more interesting to see Sylar actually make some friends and form a fictional “Sylar’s Army” (there is a fan group which calls itself “Sylar’s Army”) instead of plotting to kill everyone he comes across. The show needs to stop being like “Lost” and only featuring a few characters each episode (missing this episode: Parkman & Nathan). Spend more time with HRG and his memory-taking Haitian sidekick and with the immensely powerful Peter while de-emphasizing Suresh and maybe this show can crawl back out of the hole he is in.
What I'm Watching: Chuck
Chuck: Season 1, Episode 6 “Chuck Versus the Sandworm” (B+)
This show is not letting me down anymore. Zachary Levi has come into his own as the likeable and often heroic Chuck, and his interactions with both Yvonne Strahovski and Adam Baldwin are well worth tuning in for the hour. His massive geek-ness is well incorporated into each plotline, especially in this episode with a disillusioned government puppet who claims never to have seen a James Bond movie. I am also continually impressed with the development of Morgan’s character so that he does not become overly annoying or pointless. Bonus points for Halloween costumes appearing in a diegetic and non-intrusive way.
This show is not letting me down anymore. Zachary Levi has come into his own as the likeable and often heroic Chuck, and his interactions with both Yvonne Strahovski and Adam Baldwin are well worth tuning in for the hour. His massive geek-ness is well incorporated into each plotline, especially in this episode with a disillusioned government puppet who claims never to have seen a James Bond movie. I am also continually impressed with the development of Morgan’s character so that he does not become overly annoying or pointless. Bonus points for Halloween costumes appearing in a diegetic and non-intrusive way.
Monday, October 29, 2007
Golden Globe Musings: Best Actor in a TV Series – Drama
The following represents some preliminary thoughts on Golden Globe contenders for the given category. Predictions will be narrowed and revised towards the end of November or the beginning of December. A reminder that last year’s nominees mean zilch at the Globes and that the race is almost entirely unpredictable.
Last year’s nominees:
BILL PAXTON, BIG LOVE
MICHAEL C. HALL, DEXTER
PATRICK DEMPSEY, GREY’S ANATOMY
HUGH LAURIE, HOUSE (winner)
KIEFER SUTHERLAND, 24
This year’s top contenders:
BILL PAXTON, BIG LOVE
The lone male star of HBO’s new token drama got a nod last year from the Globes. The show took a hiatus and the buzz is nowhere near that of past HBO shows, so Paxton may fade quickly from memory.
JAMES SPADER, BOSTON LEGAL
Spader, having now won three Emmy awards for his glorified portrayal of questionable attorney Alan Shore, got only one nomination from the Globes after his first Emmy win for “Boston Legal”. He could easily come back, just because “Boston Legal” is so unpredictable as to where and when it will show up. They will probably try to get it nominated in the mini-series category just to be annoying.
JIMMY SMITS, CANE
The popular actor’s new show sucks, and he does not do much to save it. But he is an awards favorite and should never be outright discounted. His chances also ride on whether his show makes it to nomination time. Freshmen shows that have already been axed do not usually get recognized.
MICHAEL C. HALL, DEXTER
This show has only gotten more popular since its premiere last October, and Hall has earned raves for his performance. An Emmy snub should hardly stand in the way of his garnering a second nomination and possibly even a win.
PETER KRAUSE, DIRTY SEXY MONEY
The actor was nominated in this category before for his performance on the show “Six Feet Under”. Former co-star Hall, who was never nominated for “Six Feet Under”, was nominated last year for his new show, but Hall’s role is also admittedly juicier than Krause’s. Krause is the straight man on a show with a whole host of crazy people, but the Golden Globes often favor that actor for a nomination.
PATRICK DEMPSEY, GREY’S ANATOMY
Honestly, who cares anymore? Dempsey is fine on this show, but does he really deserve a spot among this crowd? The show has taken a critical dive, and the Globes never look to previous years to consider who they should nominate.
HUGH LAURIE, HOUSE
Dr. House is arguably the most popular character on TV right now. Laurie has still not won an Emmy, but he has one two Golden Globes in a row on a show that basically depends on his performance, which as far as I know has not changed, even if the entire supporting cast of the show has been shuffled around.
JON HAMM, MAD MEN
Talk about buzz with this one! AMC promoted it as the best thing since sliced bread… or maybe just “The Sopranos”. Regardless, it was a hit and got quickly renewed for a second season. Hamm is pretty good on the show, but it still remains to be seen how well AMC will do with awards guilds.
EDDIE IZZARD, THE RICHES
If anyone loves FX, it is the Golden Globes. “The Shield”, “Nip/Tuck”, and “Rescue Me” have all done spectacularly, at least in their first years. Only Minnie Driver got an Emmy nomination, but if anyone actually watched the show, it is likely they will check off Izzard’s name.
JAMES GANDOLFINI, THE SOPRANOS
It seems like “The Sopranos” was so long ago. The Golden Globes are not always kind to shows which depart early on in the year, because honestly, they are hardly front and center in anyone’s mind. Those who do remember the show probably have the bitter taste of the controversial ending in their mouths. In any case, Gandolfini has not actually been nominated since 2002.
Anyone else? The Golden Globes are rarely kind to actors they once nominated. FX stars Michael Chiklis and Denis Leary both received nominations for the first years of their shows (and in Chiklis’ case, a win plus two more nominations). Leary continues to get nominated for Emmy awards. I think the ship has sailed for each of them, at least here, but “The Shield” did have a massive critical surge this year. Kiefer Sutherland is also a candidate, but he barely managed an Emmy nomination (his show only got one other major nod) and his show has plummeted in quality. Matthew Fox had a great year on “Lost” but it is impossible to predict if the show will even make it in. Jonathan Rhys-Meyers has a shot, but I do not think “The Tudors” will make much of an awards showing. And if “Pushing Daisies” goes the drama route, everything changes and Lee Pace is probably in by default.
Current predictions:
MICHAEL C. HALL, DEXTER
PETER KRAUSE, DIRTY SEXY MONEY
HUGH LAURIE, HOUSE
JON HAMM, MAD MEN
EDDIE IZZARD, THE RICHES
Next: Best Actress in a TV Series - Drama.
Last year’s nominees:
BILL PAXTON, BIG LOVE
MICHAEL C. HALL, DEXTER
PATRICK DEMPSEY, GREY’S ANATOMY
HUGH LAURIE, HOUSE (winner)
KIEFER SUTHERLAND, 24
This year’s top contenders:
BILL PAXTON, BIG LOVE
The lone male star of HBO’s new token drama got a nod last year from the Globes. The show took a hiatus and the buzz is nowhere near that of past HBO shows, so Paxton may fade quickly from memory.
JAMES SPADER, BOSTON LEGAL
Spader, having now won three Emmy awards for his glorified portrayal of questionable attorney Alan Shore, got only one nomination from the Globes after his first Emmy win for “Boston Legal”. He could easily come back, just because “Boston Legal” is so unpredictable as to where and when it will show up. They will probably try to get it nominated in the mini-series category just to be annoying.
JIMMY SMITS, CANE
The popular actor’s new show sucks, and he does not do much to save it. But he is an awards favorite and should never be outright discounted. His chances also ride on whether his show makes it to nomination time. Freshmen shows that have already been axed do not usually get recognized.
MICHAEL C. HALL, DEXTER
This show has only gotten more popular since its premiere last October, and Hall has earned raves for his performance. An Emmy snub should hardly stand in the way of his garnering a second nomination and possibly even a win.
PETER KRAUSE, DIRTY SEXY MONEY
The actor was nominated in this category before for his performance on the show “Six Feet Under”. Former co-star Hall, who was never nominated for “Six Feet Under”, was nominated last year for his new show, but Hall’s role is also admittedly juicier than Krause’s. Krause is the straight man on a show with a whole host of crazy people, but the Golden Globes often favor that actor for a nomination.
PATRICK DEMPSEY, GREY’S ANATOMY
Honestly, who cares anymore? Dempsey is fine on this show, but does he really deserve a spot among this crowd? The show has taken a critical dive, and the Globes never look to previous years to consider who they should nominate.
HUGH LAURIE, HOUSE
Dr. House is arguably the most popular character on TV right now. Laurie has still not won an Emmy, but he has one two Golden Globes in a row on a show that basically depends on his performance, which as far as I know has not changed, even if the entire supporting cast of the show has been shuffled around.
JON HAMM, MAD MEN
Talk about buzz with this one! AMC promoted it as the best thing since sliced bread… or maybe just “The Sopranos”. Regardless, it was a hit and got quickly renewed for a second season. Hamm is pretty good on the show, but it still remains to be seen how well AMC will do with awards guilds.
EDDIE IZZARD, THE RICHES
If anyone loves FX, it is the Golden Globes. “The Shield”, “Nip/Tuck”, and “Rescue Me” have all done spectacularly, at least in their first years. Only Minnie Driver got an Emmy nomination, but if anyone actually watched the show, it is likely they will check off Izzard’s name.
JAMES GANDOLFINI, THE SOPRANOS
It seems like “The Sopranos” was so long ago. The Golden Globes are not always kind to shows which depart early on in the year, because honestly, they are hardly front and center in anyone’s mind. Those who do remember the show probably have the bitter taste of the controversial ending in their mouths. In any case, Gandolfini has not actually been nominated since 2002.
Anyone else? The Golden Globes are rarely kind to actors they once nominated. FX stars Michael Chiklis and Denis Leary both received nominations for the first years of their shows (and in Chiklis’ case, a win plus two more nominations). Leary continues to get nominated for Emmy awards. I think the ship has sailed for each of them, at least here, but “The Shield” did have a massive critical surge this year. Kiefer Sutherland is also a candidate, but he barely managed an Emmy nomination (his show only got one other major nod) and his show has plummeted in quality. Matthew Fox had a great year on “Lost” but it is impossible to predict if the show will even make it in. Jonathan Rhys-Meyers has a shot, but I do not think “The Tudors” will make much of an awards showing. And if “Pushing Daisies” goes the drama route, everything changes and Lee Pace is probably in by default.
Current predictions:
MICHAEL C. HALL, DEXTER
PETER KRAUSE, DIRTY SEXY MONEY
HUGH LAURIE, HOUSE
JON HAMM, MAD MEN
EDDIE IZZARD, THE RICHES
Next: Best Actress in a TV Series - Drama.
What I'm Watching: Dexter
Dexter: Season 2, Episode 5 "The Dark Defender" (A-)
Turning Dexter into a sort of comic book antihero is a terrific idea. He asks himself, "Am I the Bay Harbor Butcher or the Dark Defender?" His scenes with Jaime Murray (Lila) are simply amazing to watch. Rita's mother might seem like an obnoxious burden, but I trust they will do something interesting with that. How Michael C. Hall could ever get snubbed for an Emmy after this would be inexcusable. Keith Carradine is proving to be a fascinating addition to the cast, and forming a remarkable relationship with Debra. Fun to see Doakes and Maria reminiscing about old times and an old relationship?
Turning Dexter into a sort of comic book antihero is a terrific idea. He asks himself, "Am I the Bay Harbor Butcher or the Dark Defender?" His scenes with Jaime Murray (Lila) are simply amazing to watch. Rita's mother might seem like an obnoxious burden, but I trust they will do something interesting with that. How Michael C. Hall could ever get snubbed for an Emmy after this would be inexcusable. Keith Carradine is proving to be a fascinating addition to the cast, and forming a remarkable relationship with Debra. Fun to see Doakes and Maria reminiscing about old times and an old relationship?
Sunday, October 28, 2007
What I'm Watching: Desperate Housewives
Desperate Housewives: Season 4, Episode 5 "Art Isn't Easy" (D+)
There is a decent amount of material to like towards the beginning of this hour, but by the middle, it has mostly gone downhill. By the end, it has risen back up again. That is not a formula that is likely to work too well if repeated. Lynette has become too much of a miserable, vindictive charactcer that she is never enjoyable to watch. The lines of good and evil are too clearly drawn as far as Katherine and Lynette go. Additionally, Susan is allowed to have some loyalty to Katherine given that they were friends well before Susan ever met Lynette. Marcia Cross' delivery of every one of Bree's lines has become far too precocious and overthought. I remember Phyllis from the second season premiere as a much more abrasive, strong-mined individual, as opposed to the pushover who now appears on the show. These are the kind of problems that have been there all along, but they are just starting to really get annoying. Gabrielle and Carlos are a bit too open and indiscreet about their relationship, a mistake which will now presumably cause them a great deal of trouble. Gotta love that last scene with Edie vocalizing her feelings to the P.I. who just wants to get paid. Remind me why Susan is on this show again? Oh right, to antagonize the gay people.
There is a decent amount of material to like towards the beginning of this hour, but by the middle, it has mostly gone downhill. By the end, it has risen back up again. That is not a formula that is likely to work too well if repeated. Lynette has become too much of a miserable, vindictive charactcer that she is never enjoyable to watch. The lines of good and evil are too clearly drawn as far as Katherine and Lynette go. Additionally, Susan is allowed to have some loyalty to Katherine given that they were friends well before Susan ever met Lynette. Marcia Cross' delivery of every one of Bree's lines has become far too precocious and overthought. I remember Phyllis from the second season premiere as a much more abrasive, strong-mined individual, as opposed to the pushover who now appears on the show. These are the kind of problems that have been there all along, but they are just starting to really get annoying. Gabrielle and Carlos are a bit too open and indiscreet about their relationship, a mistake which will now presumably cause them a great deal of trouble. Gotta love that last scene with Edie vocalizing her feelings to the P.I. who just wants to get paid. Remind me why Susan is on this show again? Oh right, to antagonize the gay people.
What I'm Watching: Women's Murder Club
Women's Murder Club: Season 1, Episode 3 "Blind Dates and Bleeding Hearts" (B+)
I am not in love with this show, but it serves its purpose well enough, and as with many shows, hits the "good" mark on its third try. Obnoxious reporter girl is now an official member of the club, complete with check-paying duties. The backstories of each of the club members are thoroughly explored, which works well to support the main crime-related storyline of the series. Linda Park works better for me as an uncertain but honest team player ("Enterprise", "Raines") than a power-playing bitch, but she is not bad or anything like that. This is one ensemble who, despite being decently annoying, will be able to work together comfortably for quite some time.
I am not in love with this show, but it serves its purpose well enough, and as with many shows, hits the "good" mark on its third try. Obnoxious reporter girl is now an official member of the club, complete with check-paying duties. The backstories of each of the club members are thoroughly explored, which works well to support the main crime-related storyline of the series. Linda Park works better for me as an uncertain but honest team player ("Enterprise", "Raines") than a power-playing bitch, but she is not bad or anything like that. This is one ensemble who, despite being decently annoying, will be able to work together comfortably for quite some time.
What I'm Watching: Scrubs (Season Premiere)
Scrubs: Season 7, Episode 1 "My Own Worst Enemy" (B+)
This is a welcome return of a beloved series which I have always enjoyed. Everything seems to have come full-circle now since the show's inception. One of the show's strongest points has always been its nicknames for characters (best exemplified in the season one episode "My Nickname"). Snoop Dogg Resident, sorry, Snoop Dogg Intern and Colonel Doctor were just two of the unforgettable but unnamed characters. Now Dr. Beardface (that's beard-fa-say!) gets a chance to take the spotlight and be tormented by everyone in the hospital. It is great that the janitor's girlfriend is actually named "Lady", and that whole plotline should play out well with J.D. As I have said before, this show always comes through in the end with dramatic material, and this final season should be full of great stuff with J.D. and Elliott and their uncertain love lifes.
This is a welcome return of a beloved series which I have always enjoyed. Everything seems to have come full-circle now since the show's inception. One of the show's strongest points has always been its nicknames for characters (best exemplified in the season one episode "My Nickname"). Snoop Dogg Resident, sorry, Snoop Dogg Intern and Colonel Doctor were just two of the unforgettable but unnamed characters. Now Dr. Beardface (that's beard-fa-say!) gets a chance to take the spotlight and be tormented by everyone in the hospital. It is great that the janitor's girlfriend is actually named "Lady", and that whole plotline should play out well with J.D. As I have said before, this show always comes through in the end with dramatic material, and this final season should be full of great stuff with J.D. and Elliott and their uncertain love lifes.
What I'm Watching: The Office
The Office: Season 4, Episode 5 "Local Ad" (B+)
Hands-down the best part of this episode is that the ad Michael and company ultimately create is actually really good. It is absolutely hilarious as well, with Kelly standing in India and Stanley in prison. Also the most bizarre creative team working on that song. You have to love when Andy tells Dwight that Angela keeps saying "Oh, D" while they are making out. Who ever thought we would be rooting for Dwight?
Hands-down the best part of this episode is that the ad Michael and company ultimately create is actually really good. It is absolutely hilarious as well, with Kelly standing in India and Stanley in prison. Also the most bizarre creative team working on that song. You have to love when Andy tells Dwight that Angela keeps saying "Oh, D" while they are making out. Who ever thought we would be rooting for Dwight?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
